April hearing scheduled in iMEGA’s UIGEA constitutional challenge

Everyone remotely connected to the gambling industry is well aware of UIGEA and the effect this bill has had. It went back in 2006, but the law has not yet been enforced because it is unclear what constitutes “illegal” online gambling transactions. One group tried to overturn the law as unconstitutional, thus moving it out of the hands of politicians and into the judicial sphere of the government.

The Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) represents the gambling industry in a lawsuit allowed by Judge Mary Cooper in March. She rejected many of the claims made by iMEGA at the time, but said they were legally qualified to sue on the matter.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit informed iMEGA to prepare for oral arguments in April, and the defendants of the lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Reserve, were also notified. 온라인카지노

The main argument for the constitutionality of the law is that the wording is too ambiguous to be enforced properly, and that Congress cannot burden financial institutions to determine whether an individual’s gambling transaction is legal or not. Most likely, banks simply block all gambling-related transactions. The situation has already been blocked by credit card companies in New Hampshire from trading legal lotteries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *